Friday, November 4, 2005

LOUSED — by Steve Nadis

Some of you might be saying that for a guy who doesn’t watch TV, he sure watches a lot of TV. I can’t control what people say, even if they do spread falsehoods from time to time. The point I want to make is that I have been seeing a bit of “LOST” since this past summer–a time during which I’ve felt a bit lost myself. Now for a bit of explaining: I have not “watched” LOST in the same way that people who actually watch TV might watch it. I put the TV on and then get to work–doing dishes, paying bills, sorting my laundry, finishing my daily sudoku ritual (at which point I might be ready to engage in my daily seppuku ritual, if indeed it is possible to commit seppuku on a daily basis). The point is, I try to turn the TV on Wednesday nights between 9-10 p.m. EST, no matter where my attention lies.

I missed LOST the first time around and never had any intention of seeing it. But then a friend, who I assume to be a non-TV type since he is of a literary bent, told me it was “pretty interesting; you might want to check it out.” At that point, it was too late, so I waited for the summer rerun season and watched when I could. And, to my surprise, I agreed with him: It was pretty interesting. The other reason I trust this guy’s judgment is that I know he has good taste; he’s constantly telling me this blog is “outstanding,” which might be the only reason I persist in this folly.

But I digress. (Note to myself: Stop digressing!) As I was saying, then season two came around and I’m not so sure anymore. It seems to me, they’ve got all these people here on this island (if, in fact, it is an island. Everyone calls it an island, so maybe it is one, unless no one has gotten a good enough view of the perimeter to know whether it is or not.) But I digress again. (Note to myself: Stop digressing again!) As I was saying, they’ve got all these people on this island, or whatever it is, and they don’t know what to do with them. And no one seems to be going anywhere, except for the three who got off on one episode only to return in the next. (Maybe no one will ever go anywhere if the producers are determined to keep this series on the air as long as Friends, only by then no one on this show will be on speaking terms, let alone friends.)

Yet I digress a third time. (Note to myself: Stop digressing a third time!) As I was saying, another problem I’m having is that all the characters (whom I found generally intriguing/engaging the first time around) are really starting to get on my nerves. That Michael, for example, who had been generally sympathetic (despite a hotheaded streak) is now acting like a total idiot, yelling for his son every time he opens his mouth, and, in addition to being an idiot, has become a real jerk. Jack is getting hard to read, but seems pretty unpleasant most of the time. He’s getting moody–in an uninteresting way. Why spend an hour with a crabby guy? And Locke (Lock?) doesn’t seem to know what to do with himself when he’s not killing boars. Without a boar, he’s becoming a bit of a bore himself. And the worst kind of bore at that–a mystical one.

At the moment, this show, which got off to such a promising start in its first season, seems to be totally LOUSED. A few more nights like last night’s rerun, which I missed the first time around and that apparently had been my good fortune (it was incoherent and nothing of consequence happened), and I’ll have to reconsider this whole Wednesday night ritual. If I were smart, what I really ought to do is stop watching TV. Which is what I do best anyway.

Posted by Snake at 05:27:44
Comments

8 Responses to “LOUSED — by Steve Nadis”

  1. DrMax says:

    Oh Snake, don’t get me started on Lost. It had such a great pilot episode, really hooked me with all the mysteries on the island. Then some idiot producer decided they should ignore the mysteries and focus on boring flashbacks of the survivors lives before the crash. I want to see the island monster eating these people, not what happened to them in 1986! This would all be very annoying if I watched TV.

  2. Snake says:

    Thanks for the note Doc. All I can say is that it’s a good thing that neither of us watch TV!

  3. Catherine says:

    Been reading for a while and I agree with your friend…your blog is great.

    As for LOST…You’re watching too superficially. Put down the dishes and pay attention. I promise you won’t be disappointed. Oh, and if you find yourself a good message board and follow the theories you’ll appreciate LOST even more. But the key is to REALLY WATCH. Half your attention isn’t going to cut it with this one.

  4. Snake says:

    Hello Catherine — Thanks for your comment, especially the part about this blog being, uh, well, I won’t say the word on account of my being too modest. Still it’s great to hear that and it counts even more when it’s coming from someone I’ve never met before and did not give birth to me. Since your comments above are really on the mark, I’m sure you’re right about LOST as well. Most TV shows don’t require 1/4 of your attention. This might be the rare show that requires 1/2. I’ll try again next week, without the dishpan. And if you feel the urge to set me straight again, by all means do…

  5. digs says:

    If you missed the first season you can rent it or watch it on itunes. thats what i do, but i disagree with Doc i like the back storys, but the probelm is im getting addicted, i do nothing else but watch lost!at least a few nights of the week.

    digs

  6. Snake says:

    Hey Digs — I wish you hadn’t told me I could watch it several nights a week. Now I’ll never do anything else.

  7. digs says:

    I’m sorry snake i just thought that you had been spending to much time in the real world so you might need a brake.

    Digs

  8. Snake says:

    No worry, Digs. I do need a break (as do we all?) & appreciate the tip.

Leave a Reply