GOOD NIGHT AND GOOD RIDDANCE —– by Steve Nadis
“Capote” was a more intriguing film, but I have a similar complaint. There really wasn’t any drama here either because the “action,” such as it was, was almost all internalized–taking place behind the mask that Truman presented to the world. The most dramatic thing in the whole film was contained in a one-sentence epilogue that said Capote did not write another book after “In Cold Blood.” That sentence had a lot of impact, which is more than I can say for the hour-and-three-quarters that preceded it.
Philip Seymour Hoffman was fine in the role of Capote, but it wasn’t an Oscar-winning performance. He did a serviceable impersonation of Capote but didn’t do much in the way of acting, mainly because he didn’t have much of a script to work with. We never got to know the character he played, which made the performance ultimately unsatisfying. I would have much rather seen Heath Ledger and Joaquin Phoenix win for Best Actor because they actually played real flesh-and-blood characters–people who actually did something onscreen. But maybe I’m just old-fashioned.
Well, that’s our show for this evening. Grab your popcorn and get the hell out. The balcony is closed.
I recently saw Good Night and Good Luck. It was okay until the end. It didn’t have an ending. That seems to be happening a lot lately. Directors/screenwriters don’t know how to end their stories.
I agree, Roses. Just thinking outloud here but maybe they ran out of film.
This is really a nice blog,i always come here and read the articles