Wednesday, October 31, 2007
Monday, October 29, 2007
DEJA VU ALL OVER AGAIN (Part II) — by Steve Nadis
Sunday, October 28, 2007
FREAKY FRIDAY, Part 2 — by Steve Nadis
Friday, October 26, 2007
THE TRUTH HURTS — by Steve Nadis
Wednesday, October 24, 2007
TOLD YOU SO — by Steve Nadis
Tuesday, October 23, 2007
NOT THE BEST APPROACH–by Steve Nadis
Sunday, October 21, 2007
FREAKY FRIDAY — by Steve Nadis
I was headed to the park with my daughter and her two friends when I got a call from the local Mayor’s reelection campaign seeking my support. I let them know I would not be supporting the Mayor (note: his alleged three-martini-lunch habit has nothing to do with my stance), and there was nothing they could say that would change my mind. Literally one minute later, as I walked around the corner with the girls, I saw the Mayor walking on the sidewalk. THAT WAS QUICK! “All right,” I said. “I’ll vote for you so long as you promise to quit stalking me.”
That brings us to the end of the first installment of FREAKY FRIDAY. We hope you had as much fun reading it as we had writing it. And we’ll be sure to see you here next Friday. Or Saturday.
Thursday, October 18, 2007
OUR TOWN — by Steve Nadis
Wednesday, October 17, 2007
HUGGING WITH THE STARS — by Steve Nadis
HUGGING WITH THE STARS — by Steve Nadis
Sunday, October 14, 2007
SYMPTOMS ‘UNDERWHELMING’ — by Steve Nadis
Friday, October 12, 2007
ANNALS OF SHOPPING, Part 73 (“Celebrity Guest Comment”) — by Steve Nadis
“Fletch” speaks (and speaks well): By my calculations, you forked over cash of $13 for $24 of stuff. That may have put you only $2 short of zeroing out, but I’m not sure. (My formula is secret for now.) Of course, the real hitch to coupon shopping, which may be trumped by zeroing out (another matter for readership determination), lies in answer to the question: Do you really need the stuff you just bought? For example, the SNAKE household may, for the moment, have an abundance of dental products and 9 volt batteries. Come to think of it, however, I need a couple of those 9 volts at our house, meaning a trip to CVS, meaning the possibility of zeroing out.
[Editor's Note: Thank you "Fletch" for your sage remarks. At least somebody "gets it."]
Thursday, October 11, 2007
ANNALS IN SHOPPING (“Zeroing Out,” Part 396) — by Steve Nadis
Tuesday, October 9, 2007
STEROID HYSTERIA — by Steve Nadis
Sunday, October 7, 2007
REPORTING LIVE FROM THE IG NOBELS! — by Steve Nadis
[EDITOR'S NOTE: Who needs pocket protectors when you've been to every single Ig Nobel Prize ceremony? My nerd credentials are intact. And, if I'm not mistaken, the nerds are the guys getting all the girls these days, right? But I'm getting off message. A transcript of my latest IG NOBEL coverage follows...]
Here I am, packed into Harvard’s Sanders Theatre with the rest of the philistines. A paper airplane rams into my ear, followed by a moist projectile on the back of my neck. The noise is deafening: jeers, catcalls, and strange clucking noises. Have people lost all traces of civility?
Wait a minute. Nothing’s amiss after all. For this is the Ig Nobel Prize Ceremony–the 17th year these shenanigans have been allowed–and such behavior is not only tolerated but applauded. Good. I’m glad glad we sorted that out.
7:35 p.m. Somebody’s on stage carrying on about restrictions against “the flying or throwing of chickens.” Really? That’s news to me.
7:45 p.m. Finally the Nobel Laureates enter the stage, albeit with some trepidation. And with good reason. They’re about to be degraded in ways they never thought possible.
7:47 p.m. Lawyers for and against Chickens parade by, trailed by representatives of the local MENSA group. Maybe I’ll tag along with that MENSA crowd. It will probably be my only chance to get in.
7:51 p.m. Master of ceremonies Marc Abrahams tells us that 10 prizes will be given for work that “first makes you laugh and then makes you think.” And then makes you cry.
7:56 p.m. The King and Queen of Swedish Meatballs take a bow. They used to walk into this place but now just bob up and down. All those meatballs, it seems, have taken a toll.
8:01 p.m. Doug Zonker of the University of Washington delivers the keynote address: “Chicken Chicken Chicken: Chicken Chicken” –the same treatise that earned him accolades at this year’s AAAS. The talk is interesting though repetitious.
8:05 p.m. Not to be outdone, Dudley Herschbach offers his own take on chicken–this year’s theme, in case you haven’t guessed. The biggest problem to ever stump Einstein was not trying to develop a unified field theory but rather figuring out how to unscramble an egg. On this score, Herschbach succeeds where his fellow Nobel laureate failed. “You feed a scrambled egg to a hen and, in a day or two, you’ll get a nice new [unscrambled] egg,” Herschbach says. Sorry Einstein, you’ve met your match.
8:08 p.m. Dutch naturalist Kees Moeliker holds up a mallard duck and explains to those who don’t know the first thing about chickens that the thing he’s waving about is not a chicken but rather the creature that earned him a 2003 Ig Nobel Prize (for his study of homosexual necrophilia in mallard ducks). “To the best of my knowledge,” he says, “this behavior has not been observed in chickens.”
8:11 p.m. The first Ig Nobel Prize is given out, in Medicine, to Brian Witcombe, a radiologist who specializes in swallowing disorders, and Dan Meyer, the U.S. record holder for swallowing swords under water, for their report, “Sword Swallowing and Its Side Effects.”
8:17 p.m. Johanna E.M.H. van Bronswijk of the Netherlands captures the Biology Prize for cataloging all the mites, insects, spiders, and other critters we share our beds with. Thirty years of research have taught her “that you never sleep alone.”
8:28 p.m. In a stunning upset, Japan’s Mayu Yamamoto wins the chemistry prize for extracting vanillin from cow dung. The Nobel laureates are provided ice cream made from said vanillin and, with 1,000 eyes trained upon them, they can’t get out of it.
8:37 p.m. Stanford physicist Robert Laughlin is dangled as bait in the Win-a-Date-with-a-Nobel-Laureate-Contest. “Laughlin likes to spend quiet evenings watching quasiparticles behave badly,” the announcer proclaims.
8:46 p.m. Kuo Cheng Hsieh of Taiwan wins in Economics for devising a net to catch bank robbers. Abrahams, who’d been unable to reach Hsieh, worries that “the gentleman may be trapped inside his own machine.”
8:52 p.m. The Argentines win the Aviation Prize for discovering the jet lag recovery properties of Viagra. Diego Golombek of he National University of Quilmes thanks his graduate students for their fine work and, more importantly, “for going to the drugstore to get the Viagra.”
8:56 p.m. The Nobel Laureates pile onto the stage for the last act of the opera, “Chicken versus egg.” They’re dressed as chickens. Or eggs. It’s hard to tell whether it’s the chicken or the egg.
9:03 p.m. A speech and photo op later, and the whole thing is suddenly over. And I still haven’t won my Ig Nobel. Which gives me a year to figure out who to bribe.
THE RETURN OF JESSE JAMES — by Steve Nadis
I have not seen the latest Jesse James movie, which has not stopped me from writing about it repeatedly. (This way, not having seen it, I can write about it objectively.) I commented last time about the title of the film in question–a point that several movie reviewers have picked up on. This nice quote, for example, appeared in Wesley Morris’ review in yesterday’s Boston Globe: “As you might expect from something called ‘The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford,’ brevity is not a virtue here.” Another reviewer pointed out that the title gives away the ending, which is something that I mentioned as well. As for the question, if I’m going to keep writing about this picture should I actually see it? I don’t know. For now I think I’d rather keep my palette fresh, uncluttered by images of the movie itself. (Also I heard it might be boring.)
Friday, October 5, 2007
BACK IN THE USSR — by Steve Nadis
Wednesday, October 3, 2007
GREAT MOVIE QUOTES (“Into the Wild”) — by Steve Nadis
In his review of Sean Penn’s latest effort, “Into the Wild,” Peter Keough of the Boston Phoenix wrote last week: “As Penn sees it, Chris [McCandless] is a pure soul like the Buddha or St. Francis… As I see it, Penn and Chris are both self-indulgent bores.” (And as I see it–not having bothered with the movie itself, Keough may well be right.)