Thursday, January 22, 2009

WE WON’T HAVE OLD WHAT’S HIS NAME TO KICK AROUND ANY LONGER — by Steve Nadis

I’ve barely gotten used to the idea that we don’t have Romney to kick around anymore, and now I have to get used to the even better idea that we won’t have Bush and Cheney to kick around anymore. I’m bursting with enthusiasm for the Obama presidency. He seems determined to work hard and do a good job, and people all over the world are rooting for him. I hope he can take advantage of all that good will and actually get it done.

But much as I’m happy to be able to say President Obama, I’m equally happy (and perhaps even more so) to have Bush and Cheney out of the government. It’s hard to believe we got rid of them before they got us into a war with Iran. As if Iraq and Afghanistan weren’t enough. But they really are gone, Bush it seems for good. Let’s hope nobody is stupid enough to give Cheney another shot at ruining the country.

Posted by Snake at 02:41:39
Comments

5 Responses to “WE WON’T HAVE OLD WHAT’S HIS NAME TO KICK AROUND ANY LONGER — by Steve Nadis”

  1. I heard he’s starting his 2012 campaign tomorrow, sporting that classic, Old South George Wallace look. Obama has, if not stiff competition, competition from a stiff.

  2. Anonymous says:

    OK, that was just a nightmare right? Now we’re back to the real world. Aren’t we? –S

  3. Reality feels good. It’s like being in a classroom where everyone likes the teacher, and the class clown has been sent to the principal’s office–if not to court.

  4. Anonymous says:

    It’s nice to be able to say “reality feels good,” as we’re normally used to the “grim reality,” “the harsh reality,” etc… –S

  5. Da Nabes says:

    Maybe not give him another shot, but perhaps take a shot at him. It only seems fair, after all.

Leave a Reply