THE TWO-SENTENCE CRITIQUE — by Steve Nadis
I’m writing an article about a famous equation that has made the top 100 list for the century. An equally famous physicist has said that equation is wrong as well as irrelevant. I asked him why and he answered me in two sentences: one explaining why it’s wrong and the other explaining why it’s irrelevant. I appreciate his brevity but am not convinced he’s right. In fact, I think his arguments may be wrong as well as irrelevant.
Posted by
at
04:58:14
E=MC Hammer
That’s good, GM. Maybe it’ll make the 2d edition of the aforementioned volume.