August 28, 2007

MIDWEST COUNTRY JOURNAL, PART 462 -- by Steve Nadis

I'm back from the Midwest, a trip capped off by a 1100-mile drive from Chicago to Boston by way of Vermont and New Hampshire. Along the way, I listened to several books on tape--including recent offerings of the detective genre--and based on what I heard, I can say that Dashiell Hammett and Raymond Chandler need not worry about being supplanted. Robert Parker's latest creation, Sonny Randall, is many steps down from his Spencer oeuvre, which in turn was many steps down from Philip Marlowe. Stuart Kaminsky's Lew Fonesca series, which was recommended to me by a discerning friend, was good for a car drive. But there is a clear formula at play here--as well as a steady cast of characters--that you don't get in Hammet and Chandler books. So, as I've said before, the masters have not yet been surpassed. In my book the closest competition to those classics of a half century ago comes from: Elmore Leonard, Walter Moseley, and Henning Mankell.

On another note, CALL ME SNAKE is hard at work on a book about the mathematics that underlies string theory. As a result, CALL ME SNAKE is fairly busy these days and may not be posting as often or as regularly as he or she would like to. But maybe he'll be posting as often or as regularly as others would care to see. But that, of course, remains to be seen.

Posted by Snake at 00:30:06 | Permanent Link | Comments (5) |
Comments
1 - Can you put the mathematics up on your blog? I don't really understand that stuff, but it would be a kick to see if you can figure out how to make all those symbols show up correctly on the web. (Comment this)

Written by: gatemouth at 2007/08/28 - 10:34:09
profile
2 - Hi Gatemouth -- I guess that makes two of us who don't understand that stuff. Hopefully by the time I'm done with the book, I'll know a little more but this book will not have much in the way of formulas other than, say, 4+ 6 =10, which turns out to be an important one in this discussion. (Comment this)

Written by: Snake at 2007/08/28 - 12:53:27
3 - ädš×‰è+š«Ô袉 × ÍY´™„ˁÆj8mžvÚ­Hôdž0YHôã­gtŽ—oØÝ(ÚÒ:àW©è:”7ZLL&S´ù`çô¯·ŠY§¦åÜ@Ë WS%‘ðíÅ ­¹¹y$ÙæÉžž‚·¥5ÎÅÉÂ7 = r€À,
where
¨ = êµ…ÚÞéÐÜÆ$@@<U¡œ õÅu˜ÅÝ]a㏆ÑÞ#Þé1

(I'll give y'all 1 guess as to what it could be...
Hint: think 'pic' ;)

-Marco Polo (Comment this)

Written by: Anonymous at 2007/08/28 - 12:59:10
profile
4 - Wow, MP, I'm impressed! I've spent many months on this stuff & still haven't come across those equations. (Comment this)

Written by: Snake at 2007/08/28 - 13:18:18
5 - I'd say that's the mid-part of your picture, possibly describing your ugly mug...in machine language, of course.
(Save it as a JPEG & Open it w/ Notepad. ;)~~

Now, if we could just type in integrals & derivatives.
But then, how would the inventors of MathType 5.0 make a living? -M.P. (Comment this)

Written by: Anonymous at 2007/08/28 - 13:38:00
Write a comment